The complaint made to the Commonwealth Ombudsman regarding NHMRC’s failings during its 2010-2015 review of the evidence on homeopathy is on-going.
NHMRC did this review twice, burying the first version, claiming it was poor quality. However recent evidence has surfaced about this ‘missing review’. Professor Fred Mendelsohn, a member of the committee in charge of the review process, confirmed the first review to be high quality saying, “I am impressed by the rigor, thoroughness and systematic approach given to this evaluation of the published reviews of efficacy and side effects of homeopathy [….] Overall, a lot of excellent work has gone into this review and the results are presented in a systematic, unbiased and convincing manner.” Find out more here.
For the first time we are also able to release extensive details of HRI’s analysis of the Australian report, presented by Rachel Roberts at the HRI conference in Malta.

Finally, following repeated requests for further technical detail on certain key points regarding the NHMRC report, HRI has provided a new Australian Report FAQs page.