{"id":5141,"date":"2014-08-11T16:13:13","date_gmt":"2014-08-11T16:13:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/homeopathy-faqs\/research-done-in-homeopathy-is-poor-quality-so-you-cant-trust-the-results\/"},"modified":"2024-03-22T12:17:08","modified_gmt":"2024-03-22T12:17:08","slug":"on-peut-avoir-confiance-en-la-recherche-en-homeopathie","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/ressources\/homeopathy-faqs\/on-peut-avoir-confiance-en-la-recherche-en-homeopathie\/","title":{"rendered":"La recherche en hom\u00e9opathie est-elle de qualit\u00e9 suffisante pour \u00eatre fiable ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

En termes de qualit\u00e9, la recherche en hom\u00e9opathie est \u00e9quivalente \u00e0 la recherche en
\nm\u00e9decine conventionnelle.<\/p>\n

Il n’existe qu’une seule \u00e9tude qui ait compar\u00e9 la qualit\u00e9 de la recherche en hom\u00e9opathie \u00e0 celle en m\u00e9decine conventionnelle. En g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, on a constat\u00e9 que les essais cliniques en hom\u00e9opathie \u00e9taient de meilleure qualit\u00e9 que les essais cliniques conventionnels auxquels ils avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 compar\u00e9s.1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Les chercheurs ont compar\u00e9 110 essais cliniques en hom\u00e9opathie \u00e0 110 essais cliniques \u00e9quivalents en m\u00e9decine conventionnelle : 21 essais en hom\u00e9opathie et 9 essais en m\u00e9decine conventionnelle ont \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9valu\u00e9s comme \u00e9tant de \u00ab qualit\u00e9 sup\u00e9rieure\u00bb<\/strong> (19% des essais en hom\u00e9opathie et 8% des essais en m\u00e9decine conventionnelle).<\/p>\n

En outre, d\u2019apr\u00e8s une \u00e9tude publi\u00e9e en 2016 dans la prestigieuse revue Systematic
\nReviews, 6 % \u00e0 peine des essais cliniques randomis\u00e9s (ECR) portant sur des <\/strong>m\u00e9dicaments conventionnels sont de grande qualit\u00e9.<\/strong>2<\/sup><\/a>

Plus<\/span>Moins<\/span><\/a><\/p>

\n

On \u00e9value en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral la qualit\u00e9 des essais cliniques \u00e0 partir de leur \u00ab\u2009risque de biais\u2009\u00bb, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire la probabilit\u00e9 que leurs r\u00e9sultats soient fauss\u00e9s par les
\ncaract\u00e9ristiques du protocole d\u2019\u00e9tude ou son d\u00e9ploiement. Pour calculer le risque de
\nbiais d\u2019une \u00e9tude, on la compare \u00e0 une liste de points consid\u00e9r\u00e9s optimaux. Risque de biais faible = qualit\u00e9 \u00e9lev\u00e9e\u2009; risque de biais moyen = qualit\u00e9 moyenne\u2009; risque de biais \u00e9lev\u00e9 = qualit\u00e9 m\u00e9diocre. Au sein d\u2019un \u00e9chantillon de 100 \u00e9tudes Cochrane sur des m\u00e9dicaments conventionnels, il s\u2019est av\u00e9r\u00e9 que 6 % \u00e0 peine des ECR inclus obtenait un score faible de risque de biais.<\/div><\/p>\n

Whilst these studies are an important reminder that raising research standards in
\nbiomedicine is an ongoing issue, any claims that homeopathy research is of particularly poor quality compared to conventional medicine are unfounded.<\/p>\n

R\u00e9f\u00e9rences<\/span>Moins<\/span><\/a><\/p>

\n
    \n
  1. Shang A, Huwiler-Muntener K, Nartey L, et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet<\/em>, 2005; 366<\/strong>: 726\u201332 | PubMed<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. J\u00f8rgensen L et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.\u00a0Syst Rev<\/i>. 2016; 5<\/strong>:80. |PubMed\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

    Retour \u00e0 la section FAQs<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    En termes de qualit\u00e9, la recherche en hom\u00e9opathie est \u00e9quivalente \u00e0 la recherche en m\u00e9decine conventionnelle. Il n’existe qu’une seule \u00e9tude qui ait compar\u00e9 la qualit\u00e9 de la recherche en hom\u00e9opathie \u00e0 celle en m\u00e9decine conventionnelle. En g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, on a constat\u00e9 que les essais cliniques en hom\u00e9opathie \u00e9taient de meilleure qualit\u00e9 que les essais cliniques […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":5008,"menu_order":8,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-translated-faq.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5141","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5141\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hri-research.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}